| Figure 11.
The presence of IL4 during the later stages of NK cell development in
vitro completely blocks the acquisition of CD94/NKG2 and Ly49 molecules, but
has little effect on the expression of NKRP1 molecules |
|
|
|
CD94 |
|
Ly49 |
|
NKRP1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| IL2
alone |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| IL2
+ IL4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Following
primary culture of early thymic progenitors for 2 days in IL4+PMA, cells were
|
|
| transferred
to secondary cultures containing IL2 alone or IL2 + IL4, and stained 6 days
later |
| with
anti-CD94 mAb, the 4D12 anti-Ly49 mAb, PK136 anti-NKRP1C [NK1.1], or medium |
|
| [grey
line on the NKRP1 graphs]. |
|
|
| Conclusions |
|
| 1. Paradoxically, although IL4 is required in
primary cultures for the efficient differentiation |
| of
progenitor cells into NK cells, its continuing presence in IL2 containing
secondary |
|
| cultures
completely blocks the expression of CD94 and NKG2 [not shown] molecules |
|
| 2. By contrast, the continuing presence of
IL4 has little effect on the expression of the NKRP1 |
| molecules
recognized by the anti-NK1.1 mAb PK136 [NKRP1C] or the 10A7 mAb [NKRP1B, |
| data not
shown]. |
|
| 3. Further studies showed that the CD94/NKG2
receptors acquired during 6 days culture in |
| IL2 alone
were lost if cells were re-exposed to IL4 at that point. |
|
| 4. Even on established NK cell lines and
clones the expression of CD94/NKG2 receptors |
| could be
down-regulated by IL4 whereas the expression of the Ly49 molecules recognized
by |
| 4D12 and
14B11 mAbs was now resistant to IL4 down-regulation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|