CHAPTER 7: Question 1
3D Explanations
The sequence of the answers is from left to right along each row in turn.
The first step is to draw a three dimensional representation of the
molecule as shown below. The two hydrogen atoms are then separately replaced
by a new substituent (X) as shown, generating structures A and B. Compounds
A and B are identical since they can be interconverted by a 180o
rotation around the axis indicated. Therefore, the two hydrogen atoms are
homotopic.
The three rotatable structures shown below illustrate the interconvertability
of the methylene hydrogen atoms in propane, and the identical nature of
compounds A and B.
An alternative way to answer the question is to note that the 3D representation
shown above possesses a C2 axis as shown. A 180o
rotation around this axis (ie carrying out the symmetry operation C21)
interconverts the locations of the two hydrogen atoms, and this is sufficient
to classify the hydrogen atoms as homotopic.
The first step is to draw a three dimensional representation of the
molecule as shown below. The two hydrogen atoms are then separately replaced
by a new substituent (X) as shown, generating structures A and B. Compounds
A and B are non-superimposable mirror images of one another and are therefore
enantiomers. Note that in structures A and B, the carbon atom is attached
to four different substituents. Hence, the two hydrogen atoms are enantiotopic.

The three rotatable structures shown below illustrate that the hydrogen
atoms in bromochloromethane cannot be interconverted by rotation, and show
the enantiomeric nature of compounds A and B.
An alternative way to answer the question is to note that the 3D representation
shown above possesses a plane of symmetry as shown but not a proper axis
of rotation. Reflection in the plane of symmetry (ie carrying out the symmetry
operation s) interconverts the
locations of the two hydrogen atoms, and this is sufficient to classify
the hydrogen atoms as enantiotopic.
The first step is to draw a three dimensional representation of the
molecule as shown below. The two methyl groups are then separately replaced
by a new substituent (X) as shown, generating structures A and B. Compounds
A and B are non-superimposable mirror images of one another and are therefore
enantiomers. Note that in structures A and B, the central carbon atom is
attached to four different substituents. Hence, the two methyl groups are
enantiotopic.

The three rotatable structures shown below illustrate that the methyl groups
in 2-chloropropane cannot be interconverted by rotation, and show the enantiomeric
nature of compounds A and B.
An alternative way to answer the question is to note that the 3D representation
shown above possesses a plane of symmetry as shown but not a proper axis
of rotation. Reflection in the plane of symmetry (ie carrying out the symmetry
operation s) interconverts the
locations of the two methyl groups, and this is sufficient to classify
the methyl groups as enantiotopic.
The first step is to draw a three dimensional representation of the
molecule as shown below. The two methyl groups are then separately replaced
by a new substituent (X) as shown, generating structures A and B. Compounds
A and B are identical since they can be interconverted by a 120o
rotation around the axis indicated. Therefore, the two methyl groups are
homotopic.

The three rotatable structures shown below illustrate that the methyl
groups in 2-chloro-2-methylpropane can be interconverted by rotation, and
show the identical nature of compounds A and B.
An alternative way to answer the question is to note that the 3D representation
shown above possesses a C3 axis as shown. A 120o
rotation around this axis (ie carrying out the symmetry operation C31)
interconverts the locations of the two methyl groups, and this is sufficient
to classify the methyl groups as homotopic.
The first step is to draw a three dimensional representation of the
molecule as shown below. The two hydrogen atoms are then separately replaced
by a new substituent (X) as shown, generating structures A and B. Compounds
A and B are non-superimposable mirror images of one another and are therefore
enantiomers. Note that in structures A and B, the carbon atom is attached
to four different substituents. Hence, the two hydrogen atoms are enantiotopic.

The three rotatable structures shown below illustrate that the hydrogen
atoms in this compound cannot be interconverted by rotation, and show the
enantiomeric nature of compounds A and B.
An alternative way to answer the question is to note that the 3D representation
shown above possesses a plane of symmetry as shown but not a proper axis
of rotation. Reflection in the plane of symmetry (ie carrying out the symmetry
operation s) interconverts the
locations of the two hydrogen atoms, and this is sufficient to classify
the hydrogen atoms as enantiotopic.
Replacement of the two hydrogen atoms individually by a new substituent
(X) as shown below generates structures A and B. Compounds A and B are
identical since they can be interconverted by a 180o rotation
around the axis indicated. Therefore, the two hydrogen atoms are homotopic.

An alternative way to answer the question is to note that the compound
possesses a C2 axis as shown. A 180o rotation
around this axis (ie carrying out the symmetry operation C21)
interconverts the locations of the two hydrogen atoms, and this is sufficient
to classify the hydrogen atoms as homotopic.
Replacement of the two hydrogen atoms individually by a new substituent
(X) as shown below generates structures A and B. Compounds A and B are
not identical
since they cannot be interconverted without breaking a bond. The two
structures are also not mirror images of one another, therefore they are
diastereomers. Hence, the two hydrogen atoms are diastereotopic.
An alternative way to answer the question is to note that the compound
does not possess a proper axis of rotation so the hydrogen atoms cannot
be homotopic. The molecule does possess a plane of symmetry, but reflection
in this plane does not interchange the location of the two hydrogen atoms,
so they are not enantiotopic. Hence, the two hydrogen atoms must be diastereotopic.
Replacement of the two phenyl groups individually by a new substituent
(X) as shown below generates structures A and B. Compounds A and B are
not identical since they cannot be interconverted without breaking a bond.
The two structures are also not mirror images of one another, therefore
they are diastereomers. Hence, the two phenyl groups are diastereotopic.

An alternative way to answer the question is to note that the compound
does not possess a proper axis of rotation so the phenyl groups cannot
be homotopic. The
molecule does possess a plane of symmetry, but reflection in this plane
does not interchange the location of the two phenyl groups, so they are
not enantiotopic. Hence, the two phenyl groups must be diastereotopic.
Replacement of the two bromine atoms individually by a new substituent
(X) as shown below generates structures A and B. Compounds A and B are
not identical since they cannot be interconverted without breaking a bond.
The two structures are also not mirror images of one another, therefore
they are diastereomers. Hence, the two bromine atoms are diastereotopic.

The three rotatable structures shown below illustrate that the bromine
atoms in this compound cannot be interconverted by rotation, and show the
diastereomeric nature of compounds A and B.
An alternative way to answer the question is to note that the compound
does not possess a proper axis of rotation so the bromine atoms cannot
be homotopic. The
molecule does possess a plane of symmetry, but reflection in this plane
does not interchange the location of the two bromine atoms, so they are
not enantiotopic. Hence, the two bromine atoms must be diastereotopic.
The first step is to draw a three dimensional representation of the
molecule as shown below. The two carboethoxy groups are then separately
replaced by a new substituent (X) as shown, generating structures A and
B. Compounds A and B are non-superimposable mirror images of one another
and are therefore enantiomers. Note that in structures A and B, the central
carbon atom is attached to four different substituents. Hence, the two
carboethoxy groups are enantiotopic.

The three rotatable structures shown below illustrate that the carboethoxy
groups in this compound cannot be interconverted by rotation, and
show the enantiomeric nature of compounds A and B.
An alternative way to answer the question is to note that the 3D representation
shown above possesses a plane of symmetry as shown but not a proper axis
of rotation. Reflection in the plane of symmetry (ie carrying out the symmetry
operation s) interconverts the
locations of the two carboethoxy groups, and this is sufficient to classify
the carboethoxy groups as enantiotopic.
The first step is to draw a three dimensional representation of the
molecule as shown below. The two hydrogen atoms are then separately replaced
by a new substituent (X) as shown, generating structures A and B. Compounds
A and B are non-superimposable mirror images of one another and are therefore
enantiomers. Note that in structures A and B, the central carbon atom is
attached to four different substituents. Hence, the two hydrogen atoms
are enantiotopic.

The three rotatable structures shown below illustrate that the methylene
hydrogen atoms in this compound cannot be interconverted by rotation,
and show the enantiomeric nature of compounds A and B.
An alternative way to answer the question is to note that the 3D representation
shown above possesses a plane of symmetry as shown but not a proper axis
of rotation. Reflection in the plane of symmetry (ie carrying out the symmetry
operation s) interconverts the
locations of the two hydrogen atoms, and this is sufficient to classify
the hydrogen atoms as enantiotopic.
The first step is to draw a three dimensional representation of the
molecule as shown below. Replacement of the two methyl groups individually
by a new substituent (X) as shown below generates structures A and B. Compounds
A and B are not identical since they cannot be interconverted without breaking
a bond. The two structures are also not mirror images of one another, therefore
they are diastereomers. Hence, the two methyl groups are diastereotopic.

The three rotatable structures shown below illustrate that the methyl groups
in this compound cannot be interconverted by rotation, and show the diastereomeric
nature of compounds A and B.
An alternative way to answer the question is to note that the compound
does not possess a proper or improper axis of rotation so the methyl groups
cannot be homotopic or enantiotopic. Hence, the two methyl groups must
be diastereotopic.
The two hydrogen atoms are separately replaced by a new substituent
(X) as shown, generating structures A and B. Compounds A and B are non-superimposable
mirror images of one another and are therefore enantiomers. Note that in
structures A and B, the molecule possesses a stereoaxis rather than a stereocentre.
Hence, the two hydrogen atoms are enantiotopic.

The three rotatable structures shown below illustrate that the methylene
hydrogen atoms in this compound cannot be interconverted by rotation,
and show the enantiomeric nature of compounds A and B.
An alternative way to answer the question is to note that the 3D representation
shown above possesses a plane of symmetry (horizontally along the C=C bond).
Reflection in the plane of symmetry (ie carrying out the symmetry operation
s)
interconverts the locations of the two hydrogen atoms, and this is sufficient
to classify the hydrogen atoms as enantiotopic.
Replacement of the two methyl groups individually by a new substituent
(X) as shown below generates structures A and B. Compounds A and B are
not identical since they cannot be interconverted without breaking a bond.
The two structures are also not mirror images of one another, therefore
they are diastereomers. Hence, the two methyl groups are diastereotopic.

The three rotatable structures shown below illustrate that the methyl groups
in this compound cannot be interconverted by rotation, and show the diastereomeric
nature of compounds A and B.
An alternative way to answer the question is to note that the compound
does not possess a proper or improper axis of rotation so the methyl groups
cannot be homotopic or enantiotopic. Hence, the two methyl groups must
be diastereotopic.
Replacement of the two methyl groups individually by a new substituent
(X) as shown below generates structures A and B. Compounds A and B are
identical since they can be interconverted simply by rotation around the
indicated C-C bond. Hence, the two methyl groups are homotopic.

The three rotatable structures shown below illustrate the interconvertability
of the methyl groups in this compound, and the identical nature of compounds
A and B.
Back to Chapter 7
Back to answers to problems
Back to STEREOCHEMISTRY home page