CASE STUDIES
- Human Capital: Personal Asset Mapping.
- Keystone Sectors.
1.
Human Capital
Case: Personal Asset Mapping.
"Never
doubt that a small group of people can make a difference. Indeed, it is
the only thing that ever has" (Margaret Mead).
This case comes from Liz
Charles (2003/4) and concerns an "Personal Asset Mapping" exercise
conducted in a "somewhat isolated" rural community in Nova Scotia,
Canada. The final report
(Phase I) is attached as a Word file.
What is Personal Asset Mapping? (Note,
your tutor has no direct experience, and no other information on this
approach, though it sounds similar to the approachs now
being widely adopted in developing countries, though here the emphasis
tends to be on identification of the major problems being faced by the
community and attemtps to develop community based solutions to them)
- It is led and conducted by community members for the community as
a whole
- The assets or positive aspects of the community are sought and
documented
- Community involvement and participation is encouraged
- The process is intended to be continuous.
- Promotion and publicity (and the associated organisation and
management) is an important part of the exercise.
Essentially it appears to consist of documenting peoples' Interest,
Ability and Experience in the full range of activities, both
potentially economic and commercial, as well as community support and
care. A team of asset mappers was recruited from within the community,
and trained in the necessary interview and small group techniques for
collecting the data. The local RDA already has business, organisations
and agencies databases, to which it is itended that the PAM (personal
asset map) be added and made available.
Asset mapping is seen as a process, not a product - the activity of
persuading people to talk about and consider their skills, experience
etc. from a positive angle is seen as the most productive of the
potential outcomes. The process consists of:
- Community awareness campaign
- Mapping individual assets (interest, ability, experience), through
- one to one interviews
- per-arranged appointments
- groupd settings (with groups of similar interests, experience
etc.)
Some notes from this report:
- "The team had a difficult time creating community buy in to the
asset mapping process"
- "The collective belief is that the onus is on the invisible
'they' to creat positive benefits to the community. Further the
community believes that their personal efforts will result in
frustration and disappointment." (a dependency culture is difficult to
overcome)
- However, "the process of asset mapping served as a catalyst for
several individuals who wanted to move ahead with their ideas."
- 378 personal asset maps were prepared (from a total population
base of 2,000, and from 600 contacted) - "show me that it works before
I participate" was the
most common reason for non participation, with "i have nothing to offer
being a runner up.
- "The benefit of using local people as the mapping team is that it
is more readily accepted by the community. The drawback is that the
team also brings with all the negative baggage that exists woven
throughout the fabric of the community."
- "Unfortunately many gatekeepers to organisations felt that this
exercise was of little use compared to other priorities" (and hence did
not cooperate as much as they could).
- "The community is beginning to understand and accept the process"
(it takes time and effort to mobilise peoples interest and ideas).
- "During the interviewing process, some people began to develop
their occupational strategies." (The process encouraged more active
consideration of alternatives and development of ideas and
opportunities). But,"They are cautios about accepting the belief tha
they have control over their own destiny and can use this information
to help create action plans to move themselves to where they want to
be."
Outcomes: The following
statistical information is provided by Nik Grewer, Durham Development
Office) - from Phase II of the project, I suspect.
On average from the experiences across various projects in Nova Scotia:
- A Business counselling intervention for every 42 personal
interviewsconducted at the community level was requested
- A new business start-up (full or part-time) for every 167
personal interviews
- Requests for information on:
- Improving educational qualifications to improve employment
opportunities (2 requests for every 135 personal interviews)
- programmes and services that assist employers to: (1 out of
every 5 employers)
- increase the size of their workforce
- increase the skill level of their employees to improve
productivity and competitiveness
- programmes and services around the issue of funding small
business start-up and expansion (1 every 85 interviews)
- Requests by community groups on how they can restructure or
reorganize to better meet the interests (and needs) of their community
(3 requests for every 23 groups mapped)
- Opportunities to start new community based organisations (at
least 8 new requests from community members over a six month
period. Requests ranged from non-profit to community based for
profit enterprises)
Looking at an individual community in isolation, the stats are as
follows: The East Hants experience:
- 1,400 individual maps undertaken
- 100 local organisations & associations participated
- 1,000 separate skills & interests were identified
- Led to .....
- Work with 8 individuals looking to start up a business (with a
further 14 on a waiting list).
- Matched abilities & interests to current job vacancies
- Information was requested on establishing community
enterprises, including a Crafters' Guild.
- Development of community associations.
- Development of voluntary sector.
Moral?? The development
of disadvantaged communities in developed countries faces a different
problem to those in developing countries. In developed countries,
disadvantaged communities comprise those who have not shared in the
benefits (or costs) of the development process - they have chosen to
(or have been obliged to) remain where they are whilst others have
moved on, and often out of the community. To the extent that the
benefits of development have spilled over into these communities, it
has largely been through the activities and charity of outsiders
(including remissions from family members away from home), whilst
incoming investment has typically been of either an exploitative
(commercial change) or retirement and preservation nature. Both
tendencies lead to a strong dependency culture and lack of
self-assurance and internal control amongst the indigenous
population.
Related Web Sites (courtesy of Google)
Canadian
Rural Partnership - Asset Mapping Handbook This appears to be
the definitive version
NorthWest
Regional Education Laboratory.
Educational
Resources Information Centre (US)
2.
Keystone Sectors.
Maureen Kilkenny, Professor of Economic Geography at Iowa
State University, USA, is one of the leading experts in the development
of this approach to rural development. See here for her recent Plenary
Address to the Agricultural Economics Society (2004) Conference - which
provides a very interesting overview and many insights into "Geography, Agriculture and Rural Development."
She has played a leading role in developing an idea of Keystone Sectors.
A keystone in a brick or stone arch is the stone which ensures the
structural integrity and coherence of the arch - remove this stone, and
the arch collapses. Ecologists adopetd this concept in the late
1960s as a term, keystone species, for the (those) species in an
ecosystem without which the structure and integrity of an ecosystem
would be fatally compromised. Kilkeeny and her colleagues coined
this concept, as a keystone sector, (group of people/activities:
"where sectors are broadly defined to include churches, clubs,
associations, and public institutions as well as different types of
businesses and industries") without which a socio-economic community
will be fatally compromised -without which/whom the community's
structural integrity and cohesion will be impossible to maintain.
These authors remark: "Given
that the inspiration for this new way to identify key sectors comes
from ecological sciences, an appropriate analogy is that industries
induced to locate in an area by subsidies and tax holidays are
"predators."
In addition to using up tax revenues, the industries may 'feed' on the
earning capacity of privately initiated local firms in the same
industry.
Subsidized industrial expansion can eclipse the existing industries in
markets for local labor, similar inputs, or similar consumers.
Excessive expansion of comparative advantage sectors may destroy
natural resources. (and lead to 'imisserising growth' - by
either depressing output prices, and/or increasing specific input
prices, or over-using scarce local reosurces).
The targeting of a limited type of industry reduces the diversity of
the local economy. A less diverse economy is more sensitive to
exogenous shocks originating in those sectors.
Finally, especially if it is the major employer, an industry designated
as "critical" can more effectively threaten to abandon the community if
substrate supplies, subsidies, or other attractions diminish (Wolhgemuth and Kilkenny,
1998).
If such industries succeed in obtaining further public subsidy, the
"predator" may be become a "parasite.""
[Wolhgemuth, Darin, and Maureen Kilkenny (1998) "Firm Relocation
Threats and Copy Cat Costs" International Regional Science Review,
21(2):139-162.]
Their e-book, see keystone link above, (introduction) gives a brief
outline of SAMs and Comparative
Advantage (remember the Trade principles?) approaches to identification
of priority sectors/actors for encouragement/support in promoting rural
development, and then explores the idea of keystone
species/sectors/institutions in considerably more detail than can be
sensibly explained and summarised here, and is well worth a read.
In particular, they find good evidence for the proposition that social
capital, and social embeddedness of firms within the community, relying
on non-economic transactions and interactions, relying on trust and
reciprocity, are more
important in explaining local commercial success than the
conventional economic or commercial measures and factors.
The technique they employ for describing and analysing these important
social relationships is social
network analysis, using graph
theory as the mathematical (analytical) device to handle the
data. They provide a concise account of how this theory works,
and apply it to a large sociological survey of a town in the midwest of
the US.
They also describe tests of the concept of "keystoneness" based on this
analysis. This is an interesting and potentially very powerful
technique and approach, and one which I hope to be able to follow up
here in the UK, providing that the ESRC are sufficiently convinced by
the approach to supply the necessary funds and resources. Our SCOPE
(Sustainable Culture of Productive Environments) project is being
developed into a full bid under the RELU (Rural Economy and Land Use)
initiative.
Back to AEF873 Index.